OpenText APM

What differentiates OpenText APM from other similar products?

We can write our own code using vbscript to cover all our business requirements. It is highly scalable as it supports clustering. Quality Center is used as an ALM solution by all R&D throughout the organization. Solves complete phases of the Software life cycle.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

Among the aspects that stand out greatly in the product is undoubtedly its Workflow Management, as well as Test Plan and Test Execution, on the other hand, it has good User Management, Release Management, Defect Management and Requirements Management. . On the other hand the administration of the site is very good.

What do you dislike most about this product?

The Agility of the product is a point against which is quite difficult to overcome, since although it is very robust, it leaves much to be desired in terms of agility, its portfolio is not the best either, but one as a user can adapt with a little experience using the product. .

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

It is a robust and highly scalable solution to support all business needs. It can be adapted to any organization and you can solve all your problems in one way or another by customizing it. It improves a lot of productivity and visibility. For an organization that has fully embraced the SAFe structure, including the naming terminology, it is less appropriate and other than that.

What differentiates OpenText APM from other similar products?

Unlike other products this serves as the only panel to control the quality of the software and implement rigorous and auditable life cycle processes. We can also achieve high efficiency in your tests and measure quality. Ease of organizing requirements, test cases and problems by projects.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

What I like the most about this product is that the notification mechanism and the reporting functions are also competitive, plus it is very easy to generate reports and also custom reports.

What do you dislike most about this product?

Since we have been using this product, we have not found any fault with it, since the history section and the version control section are really feasible to make things easier. Defect tracking has highlights that can be used to more easily classify and assign tasks. So we have not found any fault.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

We can recommend this product as it adapts very easily to our needs, since our equipment can be complemented with this product.

What differentiates OpenText APM from other similar products?

What makes this product different is that Micro focus allows simple record management and a very reliable instrument for remote monitoring. Also, I use the micro focus tool to automate many banking applications like: Windows applications, web applications and mainframe applications. Therefore, we feel it is different from other products.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

What we like most about this product is that I can make using applications more instant and easier, and I don't even have to deal with universal delivery and VM management.

What do you dislike most about this product?

So far in our organization there have been no negative situations or events with the use of the tool, on the other hand, both the customer and the technical equipment are satisfied with its operation.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

We can recommend Micro focus because it has a high demand from experienced people in the market. Plus, it's simple to run and use, making it the best option to start with this instrument for a career in automation and a confident future.