Write a review temporarily disabled. Our system flagged this request as potentially automated and has disabled form submission for security reasons. If you believe this is a mistake, please contact us. We’ll be happy to help resolve the issue.

IBM

IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS

Composite Score

7.3 /10

CX Score

7.5 /10

29 Reviews Write a Review

Claim Software

What is IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS?

IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS provides a scalable solution to optimize communication and collaboration among teams and stakeholders to maximize productivity and quality. It enables you to capture, trace, analyze and manage changes to requirements while maintaining compliance to regulations and standards.

Company Details

Need Assistance?

We're here to help you with understanding our reports and the data inside to help you make decisions.

Get Assistance

IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Ratings

Real user data aggregated to summarize the product performance and customer experience.
Download the entire Product Scorecard to access more information on IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS.

Product scores listed below represent current data. This may be different from data contained in reports and awards, which express data as of their publication date.

82 Likeliness to Recommend

6
Since last award

94 Plan to Renew

5
Since last award

65 Satisfaction of Cost Relative to Value

1
Since last award

{y}

{name}

Emotional Footprint Overview

Product scores listed below represent current data. This may be different from data contained in reports and awards, which express data as of their publication date.

+82 Net Emotional Footprint

The emotional sentiment held by end users of the software based on their experience with the vendor. Responses are captured on an eight-point scale.

How much do users love IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS?

0% Negative

21% Neutral

79% Positive

Pros

Fair
Transparent
Respectful
Reliable

Feature Ratings

Average 74

Agile Work Management

Generative AI

Reusability

Traceability

Artifact Management

Version Management

Task Prioritization

Change Management

Collaboration

Analytics and Reporting

ALM Integration

Vendor Capability Ratings

Average 72

Breadth of Features

Vendor Support

Availability and Quality of Training

Business Value Created

Ease of Data Integration

Quality of Features

Ease of IT Administration

Usability and Intuitiveness

Ease of Customization

Product Strategy and Rate of Improvement

Ease of Implementation

IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Reviews

Role: Information Technology
Industry: Finance
Involvement: Vendor Management and Renewal

Validated Review

Anonymous Reviewer

Submitted Jun 2024

Excellent product

Likeliness to Recommend

8 /10

Pros

Performance Enhancing
Enables Productivity
Trustworthy
Unique Features

Anil Kumar R.

Role: Operations
Industry: Telecommunications
Involvement: IT Development, Integration, and Administration

Validated Review

Verified Reviewer

Submitted Jun 2024

Easy to use but cost bit high

Likeliness to Recommend

8 /10

What differentiates IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS from other similar products?

Good quality resource management and Integration with other products has large cumunities.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

Integration with other tools

What do you dislike most about this product?

cost and limited collaborative features.

Pros

Continually Improving Product
Reliable
Performance Enhancing
Enables Productivity

GokulaKrishna P.

Role: Consultant
Industry: Engineering
Involvement: End User of Application

Validated Review

Verified Reviewer

Submitted Nov 2023

the features are nice but it needs to be stable.

Likeliness to Recommend

8 /10

What differentiates IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS from other similar products?

It is a complete package with all the systems integrated to one. Easy to navigate across application.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

Working with Artifacts, Attributes, setting the limitations according to Roles and permission, clear definition of the traceability.

What do you dislike most about this product?

The application sometimes behave weird. it needs to be stable. the improvement needed for the Artifact loading, better visualization for the links under each link attribute.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

better performance is needed. visualization of the Artifacts in a larger scale. visualization of the links. filtering the attributes sometimes take a long time. Really it has to satisfy the end user who wants to migrate from DOORS classic to DNG. it should not be painful but useful.

Pros

Unique Features
Helps Innovate
Continually Improving Product
Trustworthy

Cons

Less Reliable
Less Performance Enhancing
Less Productive

Most Popular IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Comparisons

Jama Connect
Compare
Modern Requirements4DevOps
Compare
Inflectra SpiraTeam
Compare
Polarion ALM
Compare
Visure Requirements ALM
Compare
Codebeamer
Compare

See All Alternatives

IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS

What is IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS?

Company Details

Need Assistance?

IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Ratings

82 Likeliness to Recommend

6 Since last award

94 Plan to Renew

5 Since last award

65 Satisfaction of Cost Relative to Value

1 Since last award

Emotional Footprint Overview

+82 Net Emotional Footprint

How much do users love IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS?

Pros

Feature Ratings Average rating of all product features, some of which may not be shown below

Agile Work Management Multiple backlogs, backlog grooming, sprint planning, prioritization, and estimation, and a multi-level agile artifact hierarchy (Epics, User Stories, etc.)

Generative AI Generate content for optimization and integration to perform product matching, categorization, or competitor analysis.

Reusability Ability to re-use requirements across projects/products.

Traceability ALM artifacts can be traced from ideation to requirements, design, develop, test, and implementation including identifying gaps and the impact of changes.

Artifact Management Unique identification and management of individual requirements or by-products of requirements.

Version Management Ability to create and view multiple versions of a content asset through iterative edits in accordance with pre-defined limitations.

Task Prioritization Ability to assign a priority to tasks.

Change Management Ability to manage the approval of and changes to requirement artefacts.

Collaboration Includes ability to view, share and direct work between co-workers in real or near real-time.

Analytics and Reporting Includes historical & real-time dashboard visualizations, detailed & summary reporting and easy data extraction for data analysis.

ALM Integration Integrate across all project, product, development, and service delivery phases including products such as ALM and Microsoft Office suites

Vendor Capability Ratings Average rating of all vendor capabilities, some of which may not be shown below

Breadth of Features Users prefer feature rich software that enables them to perform diverse series of tasks. This data expresses user satisfaction with the product's breadth of features.

Vendor Support The importance of vendor support will vary for each organization depending on internal capabilities, but there will always be issues that only the vendor can resolve.

Availability and Quality of Training Effective and readily available training enables users to get the most out of the software you've chosen. Use this section to make sure your vendor's training programs and materials measure up.

Business Value Created Software needs to create value for employees, customers, partners, and, ultimately, shareholders. This data expresses user satisfaction - or lack thereof - with the product's business value.

Ease of Data Integration Use this data to determine whether the product will cause headaches or make data integration easy.

Quality of Features Feature quality is just as important as quantity. Use this data to determine if this product will do what you're purchasing it to do, easily, intuitively, reliably, and effectively.

Ease of IT Administration This data indicates whether IT personnel will be able to resolve issues and perform configurations efficiently and effectively.

Usability and Intuitiveness End user learning curves cost the organization money. Pay attention to your end users' technical ability to determine how important UX is in your purchase.

Ease of Customization Don't get bogged down in a difficult customization; use this data to make sure you can easily achieve the functionality you need for your particular situation.

Product Strategy and Rate of Improvement Vendors who don't stay on top of emerging needs and trends won't enable you to meet your business goals. Use this data to separate innovators from imposters.

Ease of Implementation Successfully implementing new software is necessary to realize its full value and promote end user adoption. This data indicates whether or not the product is easy to implement.

IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Reviews

Excellent product

Likeliness to Recommend

Pros

Anil Kumar R.

Easy to use but cost bit high

Likeliness to Recommend

Pros

GokulaKrishna P.

the features are nice but it needs to be stable.

Likeliness to Recommend

Pros

Cons

Most Popular IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Comparisons

Jama Connect

Modern Requirements4DevOps

Inflectra SpiraTeam

Polarion ALM

Visure Requirements ALM

Codebeamer

6
Since last award

5
Since last award

1
Since last award

Feature Ratings

Agile Work Management

Generative AI

Reusability

Traceability

Artifact Management

Version Management

Task Prioritization

Change Management

Collaboration

Analytics and Reporting

ALM Integration

Vendor Capability Ratings

Breadth of Features

Vendor Support

Availability and Quality of Training

Business Value Created

Ease of Data Integration

Quality of Features

Ease of IT Administration

Usability and Intuitiveness

Ease of Customization

Product Strategy and Rate of Improvement

Ease of Implementation