Endpoint Detection & Response
Top ThreatLocker Alternatives and Competitors

Looking to upgrade or change your solution? Take away the guesswork and stay informed with end user feedback to identify and select the solution that best matches your needs.

ThreatLocker is an endpoint protection platform (EPP) offering cybersecurity controls to protect businesses from zero-day attacks. Enabling a Zero Trust posture, ThreatLocker operates with a default deny approach to reduce the attack surface and mitigate potential cyber vulnerabilities.

8.4

Composite
Score

+99

Emotional
Footprint

10

Reviews

Best Alternatives and Competitors to ThreatLocker

Compare how ThreatLocker stacks up to the competition in the areas that matter most to real users to short list options that will best fit your business needs.

Malwarebytes

ThreatDown EDR

9.1

Composite
Score

+98

Emotional
Footprint

125

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to ThreatLocker, ThreatDown EDR is:

Better at Training

Worse at Support

Less Inspiring

Less Transparent

Less Innovative

Less Caring

Crowdstrike

Crowdstrike Falcon Platform

9.0

Composite
Score

+93

Emotional
Footprint

90

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to ThreatLocker, Crowdstrike Falcon Platform is:

Less Transparent

Harder to Customize

Less Inspiring

Less Innovative

Less Efficient

Less Caring

Acronis

Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud

8.8

Composite
Score

+96

Emotional
Footprint

41

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to ThreatLocker, Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud is:

Less Innovative

Worse at Support

Less Efficient

Harder to Use

Harder to Customize

Less Transparent

Palo Alto Networks

Palo Alto Cortex XDR

8.7

Composite
Score

+94

Emotional
Footprint

43

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to ThreatLocker, Palo Alto Cortex XDR is:

Worse at Support

Less Transparent

Harder to Customize

Less Respectful

Harder to Implement

Less Caring

Microsoft Corporation

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

8.6

Composite
Score

+89

Emotional
Footprint

59

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to ThreatLocker, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is:

Less Caring

Worse at Support

Less Inspiring

Less Efficient

Less Transparent

Less Respectful

Trend Micro

Trend Vision One

8.4

Composite
Score

+94

Emotional
Footprint

44

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to ThreatLocker, Trend Vision One is:

Harder to Use

Harder to Customize

Worse at Integrating

Less Inspiring

Less Innovative

Worse at Support

SentinelOne

SentinelOne Singularity Platform

8.4

Composite
Score

+97

Emotional
Footprint

33

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to ThreatLocker, SentinelOne Singularity Platform is:

Worse at Integrating

Harder to Customize

Less Innovative

Less Caring

Less Reliable

Harder to Use

Huntress Labs Incorporated

Huntress Managed Security Platform

8.4

Composite
Score

+97

Emotional
Footprint

20

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to ThreatLocker, Huntress Managed Security Platform is:

Easier to Implement

Better at Support

Better at Training

Easier to Use

Better at Integrating

Harder to Customize

Rapid7

Rapid7 Incident Command

8.2

Composite
Score

+98

Emotional
Footprint

24

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to ThreatLocker, Rapid7 Incident Command is:

Easier to Use

Easier to Implement

Harder to Customize

Less Efficient

Worse at Support

Less Inspiring

Sophos

Sophos Endpoint

8.0

Composite
Score

+85

Emotional
Footprint

59

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to ThreatLocker, Sophos Endpoint is:

Less Inspiring

Less Innovative

Less Efficient

Less Respectful

Worse at Support

Less Caring

Trellix

Trellix Endpoint Security

7.9

Composite
Score

+90

Emotional
Footprint

41

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to ThreatLocker, Trellix Endpoint Security is:

Less Transparent

Less Caring

Worse at Support

Harder to Customize

Less Innovative

Less Efficient

Check Point

Check Point SandBlast

7.8

Composite
Score

+100

Emotional
Footprint

17

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to ThreatLocker, Check Point SandBlast is:

Worse at Training

Harder to Customize

Worse at Support

Harder to Use

Worse at Integrating

Harder to Implement

Cisco Systems

Cisco Secure Endpoint

7.8

Composite
Score

+99

Emotional
Footprint

14

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to ThreatLocker, Cisco Secure Endpoint is:

Harder to Customize

Worse at Integrating

Worse at Training

Harder to Implement

Worse at Support

Harder to Use

Cynet

Cynet Platform

7.7

Composite
Score

+87

Emotional
Footprint

15

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to ThreatLocker, Cynet Platform is:

Less Transparent

Harder to Customize

Less Inspiring

Less Innovative

Worse at Integrating

Less Reliable

Broadcom

Carbon Black EDR

7.3

Composite
Score

+88

Emotional
Footprint

18

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to ThreatLocker, Carbon Black EDR is:

Less Innovative

Less Caring

Harder to Customize

Less Efficient

Less Respectful

Worse at Integrating

Most Popular ThreatLocker Comparisons