Application Security Testing
Top OpenText Static Application Security Testing Alternatives and Competitors

Looking to upgrade or change your solution? Take away the guesswork and stay informed with end user feedback to identify and select the solution that best matches your needs.

Traditional SAST tools often require tuning and expertise, overwhelming teams with false positives. Others are easy to use, but miss vulnerabilities. OpenText™ Static Application Security Testing (Fortify) (SAST) enables DevSecOps with precise vulnerability detection, broad language support, and seamless CI/CD integration. AI-driven insights help developers prioritize and resolve vulnerabilities efficiently, reducing security risk across the SDLC.

7.6

Composite
Score

+90

Emotional
Footprint

11

Reviews

Best Alternatives and Competitors to OpenText Static Application Security Testing

Compare how OpenText Static Application Security Testing stacks up to the competition in the areas that matter most to real users to short list options that will best fit your business needs.

GitLab Inc.

GitLab

9.2

Composite
Score

+98

Emotional
Footprint

89

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText Static Application Security Testing, GitLab is:

More Reliable

More Transparent

More Inspiring

More Efficient

Easier to Customize

More Innovative

GitGuardian

GitGuardian

8.6

Composite
Score

+96

Emotional
Footprint

54

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText Static Application Security Testing, GitGuardian is:

More Transparent

More Reliable

More Efficient

More Inspiring

Harder to Implement

Harder to Use

SonarSource SA

SonarQube

8.2

Composite
Score

+93

Emotional
Footprint

26

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText Static Application Security Testing, SonarQube is:

More Transparent

More Efficient

More Reliable

Better at Integrating

More Inspiring

Harder to Implement

Synopsys

Black Duck SCA

7.9

Composite
Score

+99

Emotional
Footprint

10

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText Static Application Security Testing, Black Duck SCA is:

More Reliable

More Inspiring

More Efficient

Easier to Customize

Harder to Use

Less Caring

OpenText Corporation

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

7.5

Composite
Score

+96

Emotional
Footprint

12

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText Static Application Security Testing, OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is:

More Transparent

More Reliable

More Inspiring

More Efficient

Less Innovative

Harder to Use

Veracode

Veracode Static Analysis

7.4

Composite
Score

+98

Emotional
Footprint

10

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to OpenText Static Application Security Testing, Veracode Static Analysis is:

More Transparent

More Reliable

More Efficient

More Innovative

Harder to Implement

Worse at Training

Most Popular OpenText Static Application Security Testing Comparisons