Geographic Information Systems
Top AutoCAD Map 3D Alternatives and Competitors

Looking to upgrade or change your solution? Take away the guesswork and stay informed with end user feedback to identify and select the solution that best matches your needs.

Incorporate geographic information system and CAD data with an industry-specific toolset for GIS and 3D mapping.

7.9

Composite Score

+80

Emotional Footprint

50

Reviews

Best Alternatives and Competitors to AutoCAD Map 3D

Compare how AutoCAD Map 3D stacks up to the competition in the areas that matter most to real users to short list options that will best fit your business needs.

Hexagon AB

Hexagon Geospatial Software

8.6

Composite Score

+90

Emotional Footprint

45

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to AutoCAD Map 3D, Hexagon Geospatial Software is:

More Respectful

More Caring

More Transparent

More Inspiring

More Innovative

Better at Support

Caliper Corporation

Maptitude GIS

8.6

Composite Score

+84

Emotional Footprint

24

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to AutoCAD Map 3D, Maptitude GIS is:

More Transparent

Better at Support

Better at Integrating

More Respectful

Less Reliable

Less Efficient

Carto

CARTO

8.2

Composite Score

+75

Emotional Footprint

17

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to AutoCAD Map 3D, CARTO is:

Better at Support

Better at Integrating

More Respectful

Less Efficient

Less Inspiring

Less Reliable

Mapbox

Mapbox

7.9

Composite Score

+76

Emotional Footprint

15

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to AutoCAD Map 3D, Mapbox is:

More Inspiring

Less Transparent

Worse at Training

Less Reliable

Less Caring

Less Efficient

ESRI Ltd

Esri ArcGIS

7.9

Composite Score

+79

Emotional Footprint

53

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to AutoCAD Map 3D, Esri ArcGIS is:

More Respectful

Harder to Use

Harder to Implement

Harder to Customize

Less Efficient

Worse at Integrating

GE Digital

Smallworld GIS

7.0

Composite Score

+79

Emotional Footprint

14

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to AutoCAD Map 3D, Smallworld GIS is:

More Respectful

Less Reliable

Less Transparent

Less Innovative

Harder to Implement

Worse at Training