Data Quality
Top Global IDs Data Ecosystem Evolution Platform Alternatives and Competitors

Looking to upgrade or change your solution? Take away the guesswork and stay informed with end user feedback to identify and select the solution that best matches your needs.

Global IDs provides software for Enterprise Information Management (EIM) and helps large enterprises organize their data ecosystems. The platform, Data Ecosystem Evolution Platform, has evolved for two decades, and is unique in its ability to scale and uses Machine Learning and AI to automate complex processes. The Global IDs platform maintains an up-to-date, comprehensive inventory of data assets, wherever they are in the ecosystem.

8.0

Composite
Score

+97

Emotional
Footprint

22

Reviews

Best Alternatives and Competitors to Global IDs Data Ecosystem Evolution Platform

Compare how Global IDs Data Ecosystem Evolution Platform stacks up to the competition in the areas that matter most to real users to short list options that will best fit your business needs.

PiLog Inc

PiLog Data Quality and Governance Suite

9.2

Composite
Score

+96

Emotional
Footprint

78

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Global IDs Data Ecosystem Evolution Platform, PiLog Data Quality and Governance Suite is:

Better at Training

Easier to Customize

More Inspiring

More Reliable

Better at Support

Less Transparent

SAS

SAS Viya

9.0

Composite
Score

+96

Emotional
Footprint

84

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Global IDs Data Ecosystem Evolution Platform, SAS Viya is:

Better at Training

More Inspiring

More Reliable

Worse at Integrating

Less Efficient

Worse at Support

Qlik Technologies Inc.

Talend Data Fabric

8.6

Composite
Score

+94

Emotional
Footprint

87

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Global IDs Data Ecosystem Evolution Platform, Talend Data Fabric is:

Better at Training

Less Transparent

Worse at Integrating

Less Efficient

Harder to Implement

Less Inspiring

Microsoft Corporation

Microsoft Data Quality Services

8.5

Composite
Score

+92

Emotional
Footprint

38

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Global IDs Data Ecosystem Evolution Platform, Microsoft Data Quality Services is:

Less Transparent

Harder to Implement

Less Efficient

Worse at Integrating

Harder to Use

Worse at Support

Melissa Inc

Melissa Data Quality Suite

8.3

Composite
Score

+87

Emotional
Footprint

80

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Global IDs Data Ecosystem Evolution Platform, Melissa Data Quality Suite is:

Less Efficient

Harder to Implement

Less Transparent

Worse at Integrating

Less Caring

Worse at Support

SAP

SAP Data Services

8.1

Composite
Score

+90

Emotional
Footprint

51

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Global IDs Data Ecosystem Evolution Platform, SAP Data Services is:

More Reliable

Less Transparent

Less Respectful

Less Inspiring

Less Innovative

Less Efficient

Oracle

Oracle Enterprise Data Quality

8.1

Composite
Score

+88

Emotional
Footprint

87

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Global IDs Data Ecosystem Evolution Platform, Oracle Enterprise Data Quality is:

Less Transparent

Harder to Implement

Less Inspiring

Less Caring

Less Efficient

Less Innovative

Informatica LLC

Informatica Data Quality & Observability

8.1

Composite
Score

+95

Emotional
Footprint

49

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Global IDs Data Ecosystem Evolution Platform, Informatica Data Quality & Observability is:

Less Caring

Worse at Integrating

Harder to Use

Harder to Customize

Less Innovative

Less Respectful

Experian

Aperture Data Studio

8.0

Composite
Score

+91

Emotional
Footprint

39

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Global IDs Data Ecosystem Evolution Platform, Aperture Data Studio is:

Better at Training

Less Inspiring

Harder to Implement

Less Reliable

Less Respectful

Worse at Integrating

ZoomInfo

Zoominfo Operations

8.0

Composite
Score

+92

Emotional
Footprint

40

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Global IDs Data Ecosystem Evolution Platform, Zoominfo Operations is:

More Reliable

Better at Training

Less Transparent

Less Efficient

Worse at Integrating

Harder to Implement

Alteryx

Alteryx One

8.0

Composite
Score

+89

Emotional
Footprint

45

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Global IDs Data Ecosystem Evolution Platform, Alteryx One is:

Less Caring

Worse at Integrating

Less Innovative

Less Efficient

Less Transparent

Worse at Support

ChainSys

ChainSys Smart Data Platform

7.9

Composite
Score

+99

Emotional
Footprint

26

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Global IDs Data Ecosystem Evolution Platform, ChainSys Smart Data Platform is:

Better at Training

More Reliable

Easier to Customize

Worse at Integrating

Harder to Implement

Harder to Use

IBM

IBM InfoSphere QualityStage

7.9

Composite
Score

+86

Emotional
Footprint

57

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Global IDs Data Ecosystem Evolution Platform, IBM InfoSphere QualityStage is:

Less Caring

Less Transparent

Harder to Implement

Less Innovative

Less Efficient

Worse at Integrating

Validity

Validity DemandTools

7.8

Composite
Score

+88

Emotional
Footprint

29

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Global IDs Data Ecosystem Evolution Platform, Validity DemandTools is:

Less Caring

Less Transparent

Less Efficient

Worse at Integrating

Harder to Use

Worse at Support

Symphonic Source Inc

Cloudingo

7.7

Composite
Score

+91

Emotional
Footprint

42

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Global IDs Data Ecosystem Evolution Platform, Cloudingo is:

Less Inspiring

Worse at Integrating

Less Transparent

Harder to Customize

Harder to Implement

Less Innovative

Ataccama

Ataccama ONE Platform

7.6

Composite
Score

+89

Emotional
Footprint

33

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Global IDs Data Ecosystem Evolution Platform, Ataccama ONE Platform is:

Worse at Integrating

Harder to Implement

Less Inspiring

Worse at Support

Harder to Use

Less Efficient

Most Popular Global IDs Data Ecosystem Evolution Platform Comparisons