Enonic

What differentiates Enonic from other similar products?

The team I was a part of developed sophisticated online applications using server-side javascript on the Enonic platform (or typescript). For every organization, it was a highly practical and trustworthy option, and we benefited greatly from it. Using contemporary front-end frameworks, there is also room to accomplish a lot of creative things.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

Enonic scales and is incredibly quick. In addition, the local setup is simple. We find it easier to adopt it across a large team of developers with diverse preferences because it is designed and documented to be customized to our preferences. It's JavaScript foundation allows understanding how things work as simple as reading about the APIs.

What do you dislike most about this product?

Even if our engineers have created a feature that is nearly identical to digital asset management, the layer function, and performs almost as well, I still miss it. So, resolve all difficulties for better work overall. And improve it in future releases for greater customer pleasure.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

The Enonic platform makes it simple for developers to create original code that meets the needs of our clients. Enonic is more adaptable, durable, and easy to use. I adore the hybrid strategy, which combines traditional editorial functionality with headless functionality.

What differentiates Enonic from other similar products?

Enonic is adaptable, durable, and easy to use. I adore the hybrid strategy, which combines traditional editorial functionality with headless functionality. It serves as a crucial component of our web platform for internal and client-facing digital services across four nations.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

I appreciate the adaptability throughout, from working with tags for our information to splitting up chores among content writers, to how quickly the site and search function communicate and share content. The tool is excellent for editors of content. It fits very well with current ecosystems. We find great value in having quick feedback loops and close relationships with the engineers.

What do you dislike most about this product?

We occasionally encounter issues, and it may be challenging to determine whether Enonic or the developer is responsible for them. The price of Enonic is also high when compared to its competitor's tool and there are not so many applications in the Enonic market.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

Regarding small, medium, and big websites, Enonic XP can be utilized in a typical monolithic style, a pure headless approach, or even a hybrid method. That made the platform ideal for us since it enables us to create experiences that are user-focused without being constrained by the platform.

What differentiates Enonic from other similar products?

This is a versatile content platform that helps us create reliable websites while encouraging editorial independence. It's also worth noting that getting started isn't too tricky. It may take some time to get used to Enonic's approach to development, but after you've read the docs and are comfortable with the philosophy, you'll be able to get a lot done.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

It is very effective and adaptable. It's lightning-quick and scalable. Since the stack is built on widely-used languages and technologies, the solution required no learning curve. The fact that it may be customized to suit individual tastes is a significant factor in its widespread adoption among our diverse staff of programmers. The central team at Enonic has always been easy to get in touch with, and the firm is always eager to integrate new features and solve existing bugs.

What do you dislike most about this product?

Content Studio's editor has relatively few capabilities, and its Html-editor seems antiquated compared to even Wordpress's. I wish there were more limitations on the placement of individual elements, such as a cap on the number that may appear on a single page or a designated region where only certain types of components can be used.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

Many users may make changes to their content in real-time, thanks to Enonic. I think everyone should at least check out an Enonic demo before buying the full version. More narrowly, to experience the system as if you were a content editor. Your editorial staff will have a blast using Enonic XP to create interactive content.