Home > Categories > Project Portfolio Management > Planview Sees Auto-Timesheet Helping With Software Project Capitalization

Software Category

Project Portfolio Management

Write Review

Planview Sees Auto-Timesheet Helping With Software Project Capitalization

Planview’s automatic timesheet feature should be interesting for anyone who’s ever tried to make decisions based on timesheet data. The vendor is marketing this feature as something that enables capitalization of Agile investments and promotes the scale out of Agile itself. But the real question is: how does the software automatically produce timesheet data?

To find out, we had to download the vendor’s eBook, The Challenges of Agile Software Development Costing and Capitalization. Although the publication stops far short of demonstrating the functionality, we can assume that the timesheets will be based on user behavior within Planview itself. If you were a gold miner, we could debate whether Planview’s automatic timesheet data is more like indicated or inferred ounces. Indeed, if I had to audit a financial statement that was generated by assumptions rather than underlying data, I would have questions about ore grades!

Most unsettling for the Agile purist is our abandonment of fixed project team costs based on stable and persistent teams. We are supposed to be able to lock the door, leave the team alone, and assume that every sprint costs the same amount… say $15,000 or something like that. In today’s reality, we must accept that people can be pulled away from the project without warning. Time records must be provided by the worker or artfully assumed by some sort of smart agent.

Source: Planview Enterprise at SoftwareReviews, Accessed December 2019

Our Take

Automatic timesheets have been done before. They are great for frontline support when we can throw a clock on the ticket user interface. They require lots of validating and editing when they are supposed to reflect software development work. If the user clicks to sign off on their timesheets, that’s a lot like weighing your ounces of gold after refinement. If the data comes from user activity within Planview, that’s a lot like using a core sample to determine how much gold is in the next mountain over. It’s interesting, but don’t try to take it to the bank.

Want to Know More?

Balance Supply and Demand With Realistic Resource Management Practices

Other Recent Research in Project Portfolio Management

Project Portfolio Management

IBM Raises Price on Software Support; Shoves Customers Toward the Cloud

IBM is changing the terms of its ubiquitous Passport Advantage agreement to remove entitled discounts on over 5,000 on-premises software products, resulting in an immediate price increase for IBM Software & Support (S&S) across its vast customer landscape.

Project Portfolio Management

The Many Flavors of Application Rationalization

The application portfolio management (APM) tool space can be a confusing one, as many software vendors offer their own take of what APM is. Enterprise architecture, application management and project portfolio management tools offer an APM use case, but these are often quite skewed the primary function of the tool.

Project Portfolio Management

KeyedIn Announces Improved Support for Agile Portfolio Management

KeyedIn released version 7.0 of its flagship product, KeyedIn Projects, featuring support for the transition to an increasingly Agile-focused IT shop. Work is assigned to Agile teams when the individual assignment is impractical.

Project Portfolio Management

Planview and Tasktop Announce Strategic Partnership to Enable Portfolio Management for Agile Organizations

To provide a single pane of glass for the work done across disparate teams, Planview announced a strategic partnership with Tasktop to expand its Agile Scaler offering. Now, organizations can aggregate the work of various teams into a portfolio and assess status and the financial impact to business objectives and analyze dependencies across different teams.