Autonomous Networks
Top Cisco Intent-Based Networking Alternatives and Competitors

Looking to upgrade or change your solution? Take away the guesswork and stay informed with end user feedback to identify and select the solution that best matches your needs.

Cisco Intent-Based Networking is a perspective or viewpoint on how a network infrastructure that meets Cisco DNA's functions, design principles, and requirements is operated. Using this perspective to operate the network will in turn enable the enterprise to embrace digitalization and the digital enterprise.

8.7

Composite Score

+98

Emotional Footprint

11

Reviews

Best Alternatives and Competitors to Cisco Intent-Based Networking

Compare how Cisco Intent-Based Networking stacks up to the competition in the areas that matter most to real users to short list options that will best fit your business needs.

Huawei

Huawei Autonomous Driving Network (ADN)

9.5

Composite Score

+100

Emotional Footprint

14

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Cisco Intent-Based Networking, Huawei Autonomous Driving Network (ADN) is:

More Reliable

Easier to Implement

Better at Integrating

Better at Training

Easier to Use

Easier to Customize

Hewlett-Packard Enterprise

Aruba Experience-Driven Networking

8.8

Composite Score

+100

Emotional Footprint

10

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Cisco Intent-Based Networking, Aruba Experience-Driven Networking is:

More Reliable

Better at Integrating

More Respectful

Easier to Implement

Harder to Customize

Worse at Support

Fortinet

FortiManager

8.6

Composite Score

+87

Emotional Footprint

10

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Cisco Intent-Based Networking, FortiManager is:

Better at Training

Less Efficient

Less Transparent

Harder to Customize

Less Inspiring

Less Innovative

Nokia Networks

Nokia Network Services Platform (NSP)

8.3

Composite Score

+98

Emotional Footprint

11

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Cisco Intent-Based Networking, Nokia Network Services Platform (NSP) is:

More Reliable

More Respectful

Better at Integrating

Harder to Customize

Worse at Support

Less Inspiring

Juniper Networks

Juniper Apstra

8.1

Composite Score

+87

Emotional Footprint

11

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Cisco Intent-Based Networking, Juniper Apstra is:

More Reliable

Less Transparent

Worse at Support

Harder to Customize

Less Inspiring

Less Efficient